Dub Alternatives logo

Dub Alternatives

Explore the pros & cons of Dub and its alternatives. Learn about popular competitors like RubyGems, Bower, and NuGet
1
5
+ 1
0

What is Dub and what are its top alternatives?

It is an open-source link shortener with built-in analytics + free custom domains. Built with Vercel Edge Functions and Upstash Redis. You can also deploy your own hosted version of Dub for greater privacy & control.
Dub is a tool in the Link Shortening as a Service category of a tech stack.
Dub is an open source tool with 15.6K GitHub stars and 1.5K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Dub's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Dub

  • RubyGems
    RubyGems

    It is a package manager for the Ruby programming language that provides a standard format for distributing Ruby programs and libraries, a tool designed to easily manage the installation of gems, and a server for distributing them. ...

  • Bower
    Bower

    Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat. ...

  • NuGet
    NuGet

    A free and open-source package manager designed for the Microsoft development platform. It is also distributed as a Visual Studio extension. ...

  • Meteor
    Meteor

    A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets. ...

  • Composer
    Composer

    It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you. ...

  • Elm
    Elm

    Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code. ...

  • Julia
    Julia

    Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library. ...

  • Homebrew
    Homebrew

    Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local. ...

Dub alternatives & related posts

RubyGems logo

RubyGems

6.6K
6
0
Easily download, install, and use ruby software packages on your system
6.6K
6
+ 1
0
PROS OF RUBYGEMS
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF RUBYGEMS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related RubyGems posts

      Bower logo

      Bower

      6.4K
      4.5K
      927
      A package manager for the web
      6.4K
      4.5K
      + 1
      927
      PROS OF BOWER
      • 483
        Package management
      • 214
        Open source
      • 142
        Simple
      • 53
        Great for for project dependencies injection
      • 27
        Web components with Meteor
      • 8
        Portable dependencies Management
      CONS OF BOWER
      • 2
        Deprecated
      • 1
        Front end only

      related Bower posts

      NuGet logo

      NuGet

      4.4K
      162
      0
      The package manager for .NET
      4.4K
      162
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF NUGET
      • 0
        Best package (and maybe only 1) management for .NET
      CONS OF NUGET
        Be the first to leave a con

        related NuGet posts

        Meteor logo

        Meteor

        1.9K
        1.8K
        1.7K
        An ultra-simple, database-everywhere, data-on-the-wire, pure-Javascript web framework
        1.9K
        1.8K
        + 1
        1.7K
        PROS OF METEOR
        • 252
          Real-time
        • 200
          Full stack, one language
        • 183
          Best app dev platform available today
        • 155
          Data synchronization
        • 152
          Javascript
        • 118
          Focus on your product not the plumbing
        • 107
          Hot code pushes
        • 106
          Open source
        • 102
          Live page updates
        • 92
          Latency compensation
        • 39
          Ultra-simple development environment
        • 29
          Real time awesome
        • 29
          Smart Packages
        • 23
          Great for beginners
        • 22
          Direct Cordova integration
        • 16
          Better than Rails
        • 15
          Less moving parts
        • 13
          It's just amazing
        • 10
          Blaze
        • 8
          Great community support
        • 8
          Plugins for everything
        • 6
          One command spits out android and ios ready apps.
        • 5
          It just works
        • 5
          0 to Production in no time
        • 4
          Coding Speed
        • 4
          Easy deployment
        • 4
          Is Agile in development hybrid(mobile/web)
        • 4
          You can grok it in a day. No ng nonsense
        • 2
          Easy yet powerful
        • 2
          AngularJS Integration
        • 2
          One Code => 3 Platforms: Web, Android and IOS
        • 2
          Community
        • 1
          Easy Setup
        • 1
          Free
        • 1
          Nosql
        • 1
          Hookie friendly
        • 1
          High quality, very few bugs
        • 1
          Stack available on Codeanywhere
        • 1
          Real time
        • 1
          Friendly to use
        CONS OF METEOR
        • 5
          Does not scale well
        • 4
          Hard to debug issues on the server-side
        • 4
          Heavily CPU bound

        related Meteor posts

        Lucas Litton
        Founder & CEO at Macombey · | 13 upvotes · 542.1K views

        Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.

        See more
        Composer logo

        Composer

        1.1K
        546
        13
        Dependency Manager for PHP
        1.1K
        546
        + 1
        13
        PROS OF COMPOSER
        • 7
          Must have dependency manager for PHP
        • 3
          Centralized autoload.php
        • 3
          Large number of libraries
        CONS OF COMPOSER
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Composer posts

          Elm logo

          Elm

          723
          740
          318
          A type inferred, functional reactive language that compiles to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript
          723
          740
          + 1
          318
          PROS OF ELM
          • 45
            Code stays clean
          • 43
            Great type system
          • 40
            No Runtime Exceptions
          • 33
            Fun
          • 28
            Easy to understand
          • 23
            Type safety
          • 22
            Correctness
          • 17
            JS fatigue
          • 12
            Ecosystem agrees on one Application Architecture
          • 12
            Declarative
          • 10
            Friendly compiler messages
          • 8
            Fast rendering
          • 7
            If it compiles, it runs
          • 7
            Welcoming community
          • 5
            Stable ecosystem
          • 4
            'Batteries included'
          • 2
            Package.elm-lang.org
          CONS OF ELM
          • 3
            No typeclasses -> repitition (i.e. map has 130versions)
          • 2
            JS interop can not be async
          • 2
            JS interoperability a bit more involved
          • 1
            More code is required
          • 1
            No JSX/Template
          • 1
            Main developer enforces "the correct" style hard
          • 1
            No communication with users
          • 1
            Backwards compability breaks between releases

          related Elm posts

          Shared insights
          on
          ReactReactReduxReduxElmElm

          React is awesome, but is just a view library, when we need to manage state, there is Redux.js. The ecosystem of redux is big, complex and hard to integrate. That's why we choose to create hydux. Hydux is simple, the main idea is from Elm, a pure functional vdom-based framework for front-end. We seperate the whole app with state, actions and views. Which means not only our views are a tree, but also our state and actions. Reuse state and actions are just like reuse react components, no need to consider dependences.

          See more
          Julia logo

          Julia

          615
          666
          166
          A high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing
          615
          666
          + 1
          166
          PROS OF JULIA
          • 24
            Fast Performance and Easy Experimentation
          • 21
            Designed for parallelism and distributed computation
          • 18
            Free and Open Source
          • 17
            Dynamic Type System
          • 16
            Multiple Dispatch
          • 16
            Calling C functions directly
          • 16
            Lisp-like Macros
          • 10
            Powerful Shell-like Capabilities
          • 9
            Jupyter notebook integration
          • 8
            REPL
          • 4
            String handling
          • 4
            Emojis as variable names
          • 3
            Interoperability
          CONS OF JULIA
          • 5
            Immature library management system
          • 4
            Slow program start
          • 3
            JIT compiler is very slow
          • 3
            Poor backwards compatibility
          • 2
            Bad tooling
          • 2
            No static compilation

          related Julia posts

          Homebrew logo

          Homebrew

          572
          502
          3
          The Missing Package Manager for macOS
          572
          502
          + 1
          3
          PROS OF HOMEBREW
          • 3
            Clean, neat, powerful, fast and furious
          CONS OF HOMEBREW
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Homebrew posts